Third-party verified climate impact assessments

Metsä Board conducted life cycle assessments (LCA) comparing different paperboards for teabag cartons, fragrance cartons and three different types of healthcare cartons. These assessments were then verified by IVL, the Swedish Environmental Research Institute, which confirmed that switching to Metsä Board paperboards can reduce the carbon footprint of packaging.

Currently, much emphasis is placed on minimising the carbon footprint of packaging across the entire product lifecycle. Two major factors affect the carbon footprint of paperboard packaging: weight and the energy used during production.

A lower carbon footprint is enabled by

  1. Light weight: Fresh fibre paperboards are stronger than those made from recycled fibre. When fewer fibres are needed to manufacture packaging of the same strength, this results in a lower weight and carbon footprint.
  2. Fossil-free energy: Replacing fossil fuels with fossil-free energy sources cuts fossil-based greenhouse gas emissions. At Metsä Board, 89% of our total energy consumption is fossil-free, and we aim to reach 100% by the end of 2030. This means that the carbon footprint of our lightweight paperboards will continue to decrease during this timeframe.

The most important function of packaging is to ensure the safety of a product for consumers. Packaging protects products during transport, prolongs product life and conveys important information about the composition and use of the product. By effectively protecting a product inside a package, we can also help reduce waste, which also has a climate.

Making informed decisions

We provide life cycle assessments and carbon footprint calculations for our customers, helping them compare the climate impact of different paperboard grades and other packaging materials. Read more about our Sustainability Service.

Third-party-verified study for teabag cartons

Verified case study for teabag packaging shows that Metsä Board paperboard can reduce the carbon footprint by over 60% compared to paperboard made of white-lined chipboard representing the European market.

The results of the study have been verified by IVL, the Swedish Environmental Research Institute.  

Food packaging with verified climate impact

Third-party-verified study for fragrance cartons

According to our life cycle assessment study, switching from a solid bleached board (SBB) to Metsä Board’s folding boxboard can reduce the carbon footprint of fragrance cartons by over 50%, while replacing one made of folding boxboard can achieve a 40% reduction or even higher. The compared grades represented board grades available in European markets.

The results of the study have been verified by IVL, the Swedish Environmental Research Institute.

Beautycare packaging with verified climate impact

Third-party-verified study for healthcare packaging

The healthcare packaging study compared the LCAs of three different pharmaceutical packaging options, resulting in the following outcomes:

  • Switching from white-lined chipboard to Metsä Board’s folding boxboard can reduce the carbon footprint of pain gel cartons by over 60%.
  • Switching from market folding boxboard to Metsä Board’s folding boxboard can reduce the carbon footprint of painkiller cartons by 50%.
  • Switching from solid bleached board to Metsä Board’s folding boxboard can reduce the carbon footprint of toothpaste cartons by over 50%.

The results of the study have been verified by IVL, the Swedish Environmental Research Institute.

Pharma packaging with verified climate impact