Challenges and solutions in FSC adoption
One of the problems of FSC is the bureaucracy involved in joining, which raises the threshold because the forest owner must have a forest plan, for example. In Finland, the process is easy because Metsä Group, for example, handles much of the paperwork on behalf of the forest owner, but in many countries, joining has been made much too difficult for small forest owners.
Another area of improvement concerns rules. On FSC’s Board, Näräkkä wants to make sure that the rules are not changed too often because it alienates members. The rules must also include some flexibility to accommodate local conditions. It’s obvious that the same forest management methods will not work in Brazil and Finland, but the general FSC principles must still apply everywhere.
FSC should not be too expensive either. For example, in some member countries, forest audits cost too much.
“I want to address this as well because certification costs must be reduced. After all, how the FSC rules work is in our hands. In some countries, auditors work hard to find any fault in forest management in an attempt to portray themselves as credible auditors,” Näräkkä says.
Making FSC an attractive option could lead to a self-reinforcing cycle: the greater the number of forest owners holding an FSC certificate, the greater the number of those who want to obtain it. FSC certification is popular among Metsä Group’s customers. In the paperboard business, it is often a prerequisite for initiating negotiations with customers (see Viesti 2/2025).
“I visited a local sawmill in Brazil. I was told you didn’t need FSC to sell planks in Brazil, but if you wanted to export products, it was a must,” says Näräkkä.
FSC-C014476
Published in Metsä Group Viesti magazine 3/2025.