Felling income from peatlands is often smaller than that from heath forests, while forest management costs are higher. In addition, the risk of greenhouse gas emissions and emissions into waterways is higher than in heath forests.
Measures carried out in peatlands must be carefully planned, taking many perspectives into account, so that the forest owner can choose the measures based on their own goals. At Metsä Group, we develop peatland forest management to ensure profitable forestry operations and to minimise their adverse effects on the climate and waterbodies.
Opt for continuous cover forestry
In continuous cover forestry, only part of the trees are harvested each time. It is ideal for peatlands, and reduces peatland greenhouse gas emissions and waterway impacts.
A stable water level is essential in the management of peatland forests. When only some of the trees are harvested from a peatland forest at a time, transpiration continues through the remaining trees. The water level remains optimal, reducing greenhouse gas emissions and the impact on waterways.
In continuous cover forestry, the income from harvesting is lower per harvest than that earned from regeneration felling, but savings are made in planting and young stand management costs.
Continuous cover forestry is especially suitable for lush peatlands because there its positive effects are the greatest. We also recommend continuous cover forestry for lush peatlands in the proposed measures in forest plans in Metsäverkko.





